In our first article, Use of Reading Logs to Promote Learning to Learn in a Freshman Course, Hurd, Beyerlein and Utschig analyze the use of reading logs with instructor feedback. The authors correlate students’ levels of reading performance with their performance on course assignments and projects that were dependent upon critically thinking about the readings. The authors indicate that the use of the tool with instructor feedback increased student performance.
Graham and Burke examine the skills that students identify through their self-assessments in our second article, Students’ Perceived Areas for Improvement in an Online Learning Environment. The authors utilize answers to a self-assessment tool to examine the aff ective and cognitive skills identifi ed by the students as areas for improvement in an online learning environment. Additionally, a case study examines the timing of the transition from identification of improvement affective skills necessary to learning to only identifying cognitive skills.
Watts provides a thorough examination of the Learning Process Methodology in our third article, The Learning Process Methodology: A Universal Model of the Learning Process and Activity Design. Watts correlates each of the steps of the Learning Process Methodology to models for instructional design as well as providing an in-depth discussion of each step.
In their article, Impact of Higher Education Culture on Student Mindset and Success, Apple, Jain, Beyerlein and Ellis utilize the fourteen cultural aspects as a theoretical framework to compare and contrast the culture of teaching and learning. The authors examine the fourteen aspects of a traditional culture within Higher Education as compared to a transformational culture through the lens of institutional values, faculty mindsets, practices and student mindsets.
Finally, in their article, 100 Best Practices for Teaching Learning to Learn and Self-Growth, Sweeney, Apple and Ulbrich delineate the best practices for teaching and learning. While classifying the practices into eleven Process Education areas, the authors discuss and reference the key tools and practices that practitioners can utilize to will transform and empower students.